← Case study PRD Stories AI Workflow Metrics Architecture Release

AI Workflow Design · v1.0

How the AI behaves, and what it costs

The bridge between "we use AI" and exactly how it behaves, when it's trusted, and what it costs — the doc I'd defend line-by-line with an ML engineer.

Owner Product, with ML Engineering · shared pipeline for creative generation and performance recommendation.

Pipeline

Input Model call(s) Confidence scoring Lane assignment Human review* Action Feedback loop

Model routing — match cost to risk, not "best everywhere"

First-pass creativeLower-cost modelHigh volume, low stakes — filtered before a human sees it.
Top-N refinementHigher-capability modelLow volume, higher bar — reaches the reviewer.
Brand-safety checkDeterministic rulesCompliance-critical — never left to probabilistic behavior.

Confidence scoring

Confidence = f(model self-score, historical acceptance rate, data volume, signal strength)

Review lanes

Auto-apply
High confidence + low blast radius + established trust tier.
Suggest
Medium confidence, or newer account — most v1 traffic lands here by design.
Escalate
Low confidence, thin data, or compliance-sensitive action.

Cost controls